
In 2005, Joel Greenblatt published a book that many people consider one of the classics of investing literature. In his book, Joel Greenblatt explains how investors may outperform market averages by following his simple process of investing in what he believes are good companies at bargain prices. In our opinion, this strategy can be used for many types of investors with varying levels of assets. Now, Formula Investing is using this strategy to make it easier for individuals to invest.
Learn more about the book.
The Concept Behind Formula Investing
The concept behind Formula Investing is simple. The idea is to systematically follow a strategy that buys above average companies but only when they can be purchased at below average prices. That's it. It is an investment strategy designed to be relentlessly logical, disciplined, and cost effective. Here's how it works:The idea is to systematically follow a strategy that buys above average companies but only when they can be purchased at below average prices.
It is true that some companies that rank highly according to the formula may be "cheap" for a good reason. It is also true that some companies that have earned a high return on capital in the past may not be able to do so in the future due to competition, disappointing new products or for many other reasons. However, I believe that choosing 20 to 30 stocks that rank highly according to the formula will result in a portfolio that consists on average of companies that are both good and cheap. As Benjamin Graham famously said, "in the short term the market is a voting machine but in the long term, it is a weighing machine". In other words, market prices may reflect volatile emotions in the short term but over the long term the stock market is actually very good at accurately assessing the value of businesses (though this can often take months or years to happen). If this is true as I believe, many of the bargains in our formula portfolios will be recognized by the market and higher prices will result.However, I believe that choosing 20 to 30 stocks that rank highly according to the formula will result in a portfolio that consists on average of companies that are both good and cheap.
The catch is this. This is a long term strategy. Even during historic periods that displayed excellent overall backtested results, there were still periods of months or even years where the stocks theoretically selected by the formula did not outperform the market. There were also periods where the market was down and while the theoretical formula portfolio lost less than the overall market average, it was still down. It is virtually certain that these difficult periods will return in the future. In fact, a formula that beat the market every month or every year would quickly be copied and most likely have its excess returns competed away in a relatively short period of time. It is much more difficult to follow a formula that has periods of underperformance even though the strategy makes sense over the long term. But that's one reason why I believe the formula will continue to work. Most investors will continue chasing managers or strategies that have worked well recently.